I’m happy to see eHarmony responding inside their recognized weblog to a write-up called “Marriage-Maker states Are Tied in Knots ” from Wall Street diary. The WSJ post examines many of the marriage statistics released by internet dating sites like eHarmony also the methodology always estimate this type of statistics. We talked somewhat about this subject too, a month or more ago when the original WSJ article ended up being printed (see Story).
The WSJ article did not expect kindly about statistics revealed by internet dating sites, and for the the majority of component we agree with the author. Anyone needs to learn how these research are produced. Of the many adult dating sites discussed in the WSJ article, “eHarmony sticks out as among a lot more mindful ones”. This isn’t precisely a glowing report for eHarmony therefore, they chose to post a reply to their blog.
During the eHarmony post each goes into additional information on how they calculated that their unique dating website was actually accountable for 2percent of marriages in the usa, from 12-month duration closing March 2007. A lot of the details we currently knew about from a previously revealed PDF file named “eHarmony | Harris Interactive 2007 Marriage Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), nevertheless the article really does eliminate some more details. What this blog article does show is actually, eHarmony is wanting is as open and clear using their research results as it can. I think the name “start correspondence” may undoubtedly end up being a great choice for your recognized eHarmony weblog.
Here’s the complete eHarmony reaction to the Wall Street Journal about how precisely they assess their unique relationship stats. For further details about this dating internet site, browse all of our breakdown of eHarmony.